During a software audit, do vendors typically allow a license statement to include software that is pending paymen
We are implementing an asset management system and we are working with Procurement to create a data feed for our hardware and software POs. Should we import POs that are pending payment, or should we only import POs that we have paid? It is my understanding we do not own the license until we pay and that the license does not appear on the vendor's license statement for our organization until we pay. If we import licenses that we have not paid, couldn't this corrupt the feature that compares the installed base with the purchased base?